The case study explores the capital budgeting challenges faced by Clarence Infra Projects Ltd, a company deeply committed to maximising shareholder value while navigating the complex world of capital investments. Despite their dedication to value maximisation, the company sometimes made decisions that contradicted this principle due to practical considerations. These contradictions highlight the real-world complexities of decision-making and the need to balance theory with pragmatism. The study presents three investment choices: solar power expansion, wind farm development, and hydroelectric power plant, each with distinct cash flow patterns. The managers traditionally used the payback period method, but they also employed the discounted cash flow methods, including net present value and internal rate of return, to evaluate the projects. Sensitivity analysis under various reduction scenarios is conducted to assess the resilience of the projects. Ultimately, the case highlights the importance of aligning financial theory with real-world complexities to make informed investment decisions.

Bierman Jr., H., & Smidt, S. (2012). The capital budgeting decision: Economic analysis of investment projects. Routledge.

Fabozzi, F. J., & Peterson, P. P. (2003). Financial management and analysis (Vol. 132). John Wiley & Sons.

Garrett, D. E., & Garrett, D. E. (1989). Profitability analysis; discounted cash flow (DCF). Chemical engineering economics (pp. 81–106). Springer.

Karanovic, G., Baresa, S., & Bogdan, S. (2010). Techniques for managing projects risk in capital budgeting process. UTMS Journal of Economics, 1(2), 55–66.

Lefley, F. (1996). The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics, 44(3), 207–224.

Lohmann, J. R. (1988). The IRR, NPV and the fallacy of the reinvestment rate assumptions. The Engineering Economist, 33(4), 303–330.

Mackevičius, J., & Tomaševič, V. (2010). Evaluation of investment projects in case of conflict between the internal rate of return and the net present value methods. Ekonomika, 89(4), 116–130.

Oosterom, J. P., & Hall, C. A. (2022). Enhancing the evaluation of energy investments by supplementing traditional discounted cash flow with energy return on investment analysis. Energy Policy, 168, 112953.

Osborne, M. J. (2010). A resolution to the NPV–IRR debate? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(2), 234–239.

Piper, J. A. (1980). Classifying capital projects for top management decision-making. Long Range Planning, 13(3), 45–56.

Van Horne, J. C. (2002). Financial management & policy (12th ed.). Pearson Education India.

Weber, T. A. (2014). On the (non-)equivalence of IRR and NPV. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 52, 25–39.

Yard, S. (2000). Developments of the payback method. International Journal of Production Economics, 67(2), 155–167.