Review of Professional Management

Assessing the Environmental Sustainability Corridor for BRICS Nations by Integrating Three SDGs, ‘Biocapacity’ and ‘Ecological Footprint’

Rakesh Shahani¹and Aishwarya Badaik¹

First Published 2 Dec 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/09728686241286588

Article Information

Corresponding Author:

Rakesh Shahani, Department of Business Economics, Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar College (University of Delhi), Delhi 110094, India.
Email: rakesh.shahani@bramb.du.ac.in

¹ Department of Business Economics, Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar College (University of Delhi), Delhi, India

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.

Abstract

The present study makes an attempt to analyse the co-integrating relation between ‘ecological footprint’ on one hand and GDP, trade openness, forest area and biocapacity on the other for the period 1992–2015 for five BRICS economies with the objective of ascertaining whether the rapid growth achieved by the BRICS is along a ‘sustainable’ path. Further, the study also tries to lookout for signs of ‘convergence’ of ‘ecological footprint’ amongst all BRICS economies. The methodology employed includes ARDL Co-integration Model, TY Causality and Beta Convergence Models. The results showed existence of long run co-integration amongst four BRICS nations (except for India where no co-integration was proved) with fast speed of adjustment towards long run equilibrium. Further, short-run causality was seen moving from ‘GDP’ and ‘forest area’ towards ‘ecological footprint’ in three of the five BRICS nations, while variable ‘trade’ was not seen causing ‘ecological footprint’. ‘Beta convergence’ was also proved for ‘ecological footprint’ amongst all BRICS nations. These results thus provide a clear indication as to which variables need to be targeted to achieve a ‘sustainable’ growth. The results also reveal the pace of long-term adjustment as shown by ECM(1) term, which would enable policymakers to plan their action for fulfilment of the objective of tackling ‘environmental degradation’ in BRICS economies. Also, convergence of ‘ecological footprint’ across BRICS indicates that similar policies to tackle environmental degradation could be framed for BRICS at their group meetings.

Keywords

Biocapacity, BRICS, causality, co-integration, convergence, ecological footprint

References

Agarwal, M., & Kumar, S. (2023). BRICS countries’ increasing role in the world economy, including institutional innovation. BRICS Journal of Economics, 4(2), 173–191.

Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Rjoub, H., Kalugina, O. A., & Hussain, N. (2022). Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595–605.

Ansari, M. A., Haider, S., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Environmental Kuznets curve revisited: An analysis using ecological and material footprint. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106416

Danish, U. R., & Khan, S. U. D. (2019). Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996

Danish, U. R., Khan, S. U. D., Baloch, M. A., & Li, N. (2020). Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Is there any trade‐off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction? Sustainable Development, 28(4), 813–822.

Fotis, P., & Polemis, M. (2018). Sustainable development, environmental policy and renewable energy use: A dynamic panel data approach. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 726–740.

Hassan, S. T., Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. (2019). Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516

Hastik, R., Walzer, C., Haida, C., Garegnani, G., Pezzutto, S., Abegg, B., & Geitner, C. (2016). Using the “footprint” approach to examine the potentials and impacts of renewable energy sources in the European Alps. Mountain Research and Development, 36(2), 130–140

Murshed, M., Rahman, M. A., Alam, M. S., Ahmad, P., & Dagar, V. (2021). The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: Linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(36), 49967–49988.

Nathaniel, S., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709

Nathaniel, S., Anyanwu, O., & Shah, M. (2020a). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint in the Middle East and North Africa region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 14601–14613.

Nathaniel, S., Nwodo, O., Sharma, G., & Shah, M. (2020b). Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint linkage in CIVETS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 19616–19629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08466-0

Network, G. F. (2014). Working guidebook to the National Footprint Accounts 2014. Global Footprint Network.

Omojolaibi, J. A., Yameogo, C. E., & Ogunbusola, O. J. (2020). Carbon dioxide emissions convergence and institutional quality in Ecowas. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 12(1), 69–90.

O’neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs (Vol. 66, pp. 1–16). Goldman Sachs.

Payne, R. A. (1995). Freedom and the environment. Journal of Democracy, 6(3), 41–55.

Pesaran, M. H. & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag approach to co-integration analysis. In A. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: Centennial Volume of Ragnnar Frisch. Cambridge University Press.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.

Radmehr, R., Shayanmehr, S., Ali, E. B., Ofori, E. K., Jasińska, E., & Jasiński, M. (2022). Exploring the nexus of renewable energy, ecological footprint, and economic growth through globalization and human capital in G7 economics. Sustainability, 14(19), 12227.

Rashid, A., Irum, A., Malik, I. A., Ashraf, A., Rongqiong, L., Liu, G., Ullah, H., Ali, M. U. & Yousaf, B. (2018). Ecological footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan’s first footprint analysis from urbanization perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 362–368. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.186

Sarkodie, S. A., & Adams, S. (2018). Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 643, 1590–1601.

Shahani, R., & Aayushi. (2019). Exploring dynamic linkages between inward FDI and India’s economic growth. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 8(2), 109–117.

Sharma, A., & Shahani, R. (2018). A comparative analysis of the seasonal trends in India and other markets of the BRICS nations. Effulgence, 16(1), 14–26.

Tiwari, C., & Mishra, M. (2017). Testing the CO2 emissions convergence: Evidence from Asian countries. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 6(1), 67–72.

Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250.

White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838.

Zagheni, E. (2011). The leverage of demographic dynamics on carbon dioxide emissions: Does age structure matter? Demography, 48(1), 371–399.